(Natural News)—Canadian economist Prof. Michel Chossudovsky discussed with Mike Adams during a recent episode of the “Health Ranger Report” how the U.S. Empire is run by arrogant and bullying leaders who do not consider the consequences of nuclear war – let alone understand history and geopolitics – making it seem that they are not aware of the limits and danger of their own power.
Chossudovsky, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Ottawa and president and director of the Centre for Research on Globalization, pointed out during the show how the “decision-makers” are brainwashing the public into believing their narrative. “The problem is that the decision-makers are necessarily specialists in nuclear war. They create and believe in their own propaganda. Decision-makers are also victims of their own propaganda,” the expert on geopolitical, economic, and public health analysis around the world said.
“I’ve been doing research on nuclear weapons for more than 20 years. But what struck me was this Nuclear Posture Review under the Bush administration published in 2002, where public opinion was led to believe that nuclear weapons, particularly the so-called mini-nukes, were harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion was underground,” he disclosed and added, with a disclaimer that he is quoting Pentagon documents. According to the Department of Defense (DOD), the Nuclear Posture Review is a legislatively mandated review that establishes U.S. nuclear policy, strategy, capabilities, and force posture for the next five to ten years.
He analogized what happened to a pack of cigarettes and the government would say, “Smoking is good for your health.” They changed the label and they said, “This bomb is good for your health, go ahead and use it.” “That was entrenched in the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review. At the same time, it recategorized nuclear weapons so that they could be used in the conventional war theater. They did not require the permission of the commander-in-chief, it could be a three-star general-approved. Now that, I think, is the beginning of this whole process,” he recalled.
Adams agreed adding that this put the country in very dangerous waters. Meanwhile, the host mentioned a recent military exercise being conducted that could launch a nuclear conflict – Operation Sea Breeze by the U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, which ran from Sept 11 to 15 in Constanta, Romania. “This is a land and sea-based exercise with multinational Allies and Partners, aimed to enhance the capabilities of the Black Sea and Partnership for Peace maritime security forces while progressively training and preparing the Ukraine Maritime Command staff,” the U.S. Navy website wrote.
“This [Sea Breeze exercises] could be used as a cover story to plant or to detonate a nuclear weapon,” Adams warned and also cited the Baltic Sea operations, which was used as a reason to plant the explosives that blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.
“It was civilian infrastructure target that has devastated the industrial economies of Germany and other European, and Western European nations,” the Natural News and Brighteon founder said. “This is something that the U.S. has done before. And I’m very concerned that they may do it again.”
Chossudovsky concurred pointing out that the United States has invested in a $1.3 trillion nuclear weapons program, which “goes into the pockets of the military-industrial complex.” And not only that, he also emphasized the fact that nuclear weapons are already on the table and they’re not something which are there as a weapon of last resort. Thus, he said, any incident in the Black Sea, resulting from the exercise and deployment of military hardware, could lead to a false flag and trigger World War three. (Related: Nuclear war escalation alert – Urgent interview with Steve Quayle.)
U.S. is willing to commit suicide just to incite WWIII with Russia
Elsewhere in the show, Adams and Chossudovsky talked about acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and her role in triggering an imminent war with the Russians. “In my opinion, she is one of the most dangerous figures in the history of the United States of America. And she has ethnic hatred toward people of Russian, ethnicity or descent. She seeks the total destruction of an entire ethnic group. Her obvious hatred is allowed to run amok across U.S. foreign policy,” the Health Ranger noted. “This kind of thing leads me to believe that out of sheer desperation to destroy Russia, the U.S. is willing to set off a nuclear weapon against its own naval vessels, in a Pearl Harbor-like incident, to gain public support for full engagement with Russia in World War Three.”
For the professor, Nuland has an instrument of their powerful entities behind her, which stay in the shadows. But for him, removing Nuland will not change things. “Nuland is in Africa but she’s all over the place as far as regime change is concerned. I read that Secretary General of NATO Jens Stoltenberg made a statement a few months back, saying very textually the war started in 2014. Now, everybody says it’s the Russians that started it in February 2022. But then he said, ‘No, it didn’t start. It’s there,'” the professor said citing an interview of the NATO head with the Washington Post.
He also explained that looking at the start of the war in 2014, Noland was there, associated very closely with the “Nazi parties,” which showed that there was a neo-Nazi agenda embedded in U.S. foreign policy. “And when I look at the project of the New American Century, it also has certain doctrine behind it when they said we are going to wage a long war and a whole series of theater wars and will also modernize a weapons system. But the thing is, those wars are simultaneous. Nuland must have been also involved because her husband was one of the authors of this project.”
This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.