Here’s an unpopular but undeniable truth: Big Tech and mainstream media have pressured the vast majority of “conservative” news outlets into self-censoring. It’s undeniable. They won’t mention “Dominion Voting Systems” because they think they’ll get sued. That’s a different scenario from the one we’re discussing today. Granted, WE’VE been talking about Dominion ever since breaking the story on November 6th about them in Antrim County. But I can at least understand why bigger news outlets don’t want to get sued.
The self-censoring sites that annoy me are the ones who are doing it because they’re beholden to Facebook, Google, and to a lesser extent Twitter. Looking at the statistics available about traffic sources, it’s easy to see who is avoiding controversial topics like voter fraud, vaccine concerns, climate change hysteria, or Black Lives Matter based on which ones are getting the lion’s share of their traffic from Big Tech.
They won’t claim the 2020 election was even possibly stolen because they’ll get nixed (as we have been) by Google and YouTube. They won’t mention legitimate, scientific concerns about the vaccines because Facebook will slap them down, as they’ve done with our Facebook pages. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” to want more data available about experimental drugs unlike any vaccines ever approved by the FDA. It shouldn’t be taboo to ask questions.
Here are some sites in no particular order that are generally more open than other conservative sites when it comes to discussing these and other controversial topics. This list is not exhaustive by any means; if you know others, please send me a comment. I’ve noted sites that we control.
- The Gateway Pundit
- The Last Refuge
- NOQ Report (ours)
- National File
- One America News
- The Liberty Loft
- Natural News
- Conservative Playbook (ours)
- PJ Media
- 100% Fed Up
- Freedom First Network (ours)
- Uncover DC
- American Conservative Movement (ours)
As for news aggregators that do the same and report honest stories that go against the accepted mainstream narrative, here’s the list that I sent last week as well:
We are proud that out of nearly 2.9 millions visitors since February after election-related traffic spikes died down, only 26K came from Google. They’re our FOURTH biggest search engine, which is to say they hate us, and for good reason. We won’t shut up about the stuff that’s important.
You may not believe the 2020 election was stolen. You may not believe the threat of Covid-19 for healthy people under the age of 40 does not warrant mass inoculation with experimental drugs that are not effective enough to allow us to take off our face masks. You may not believe man-made climate change will not kill us off in 7.5 years. You may not believe Critical Race Theory is, itself, racist.
We tend to believe these things, so we report on them. It’s good for discourse in a free society whether you believe these things or not. But with that said, unsubscribing to this newsletter is hassle-free – just reply with “unsubscribe” and I’ll remove your email address so we can part as friends.
If you’re still reading, then hopefully that means that you appreciate journalism that tackles the tough topics even if doing so gets us in trouble with the “arbiters-of-truth” in mainstream media and Big Tech. We’re racking up the “fact-checks” on us for saying crazy things like reporting that Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who advocates for Hydroxychloroquine as part of a Covid-19 treatment, saved lives and was nominated for Nobel Prize as a result. We were fact-checked for an op-ed that claimed the “no herd immunity” narrative was political, not scientific. We were even dinged for saying face masks reduce oxygen intake.
And that’s just the “fact-checks” this week.
We could use your help. Whether through our Locals, Giving Fuel page, PayPal, or Bitcoin (3JuqBrcVKis17R1fKGxySyYACkjjCqiwdK), we would appreciate contributions to keep the sites going strong. It may give us pride to know Google, Facebook, and Twitter hate us, but telling the truth they don’t want people to hear reduces revenue dramatically. We run a tight ship but this is a full-time job and since lockdowns started decimating the economy, ad revenues have dropped severely. If you can give, we’d greatly appreciate it.
Truth is too precious to let Big Tech tyrants or mainstream media puppets dictate it. They are pushing a post-truth society in America. The only way to fight it is to keep the actual truth blaring at as many Americans as possible.
For reference, here is the article about “no herd immunity” that got us in trouble. You can see for yourself if this is worthy of a Facebook suspension…
The ‘consensus’ about no Covid herd immunity is political, not scientific
The New York Times is playing their part in the long game of perpetual Covid-19 authoritarianism running every aspect of our lives.
Covid-19 is here to stay, and if you’re a freedom-loving conservative, a Covid-vaccine-skeptic, or both, it’s all your fault. Well, mostly. According to the NY Times, there is some blame to be passed along to the Chinese-created coronavirus itself as it mutates faster than Dr. Anthony Fauci’s talking points. But really, the overarching message from the NY Times that is being echoed by leftists on social media is that it’s all your fault, you anti-science knuckle-dragging hillbilly MAGA bigot!
The NY Times article declares, “Reaching ‘Herd Immunity’ Is Unlikely in the U.S., Experts Now Believe.” They call it a “consensus.” They used science-esque sounding words to make us believe there is no light at the end of the tunnel, mostly because of the people who are concerned about vaccines that are experimental, not FDA-approved, and did not fit the definition of “vaccine” until they changed the meaning in the Merriam-Webster dictionary a few weeks ago. If you’re reading this article, chances are you engage in some combination of fighting against face masks, social distancing, lockdowns, or vaccines, and therefore our readers are the target market for the hatred being pushed by the NY Times.
But this isn’t really about the science. If we wanted herd immunity, we would have done what has always been done since the notion of herd immunity came into being. We would have kept things open, dumped the masks (whose efficacy is questionable at best), loaded up on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, and allowed otherwise healthy people to live their lives. Over time, herd immunity could have been achieved. Meanwhile, we could have protected the most vulnerable by enacting policies that were the exact opposite of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo until herd immunity amongst the younger population was achieved.
No, I’m not a doctor. I’ve only read or listened to what real doctors have been saying for over a year. Call me a medical junky; I was following Dr. Scott Atlas and Dr. Joseph Mercola since before it was cool. And what those who are apparently not part of the “consensus” have been saying all along is that we need to protect the vulnerable and let everyone else take their chances if they so wish. Freedom was the path to herd immunity and the formerly freest nation in the world failed to walk it.
Now, the narrative is being formed around no future herd immunity. This is political, 100%. It’s about keeping us blaming each other, but more importantly it’s the latest phase in the “get vaccinated you dumb Neanderthal” agenda. But the biggest reason they’re putting this “consensus” out there now is to set the stage for Covid-19, Covid-22, Covid-23, Covid-25… to be our ongoing top-of-mind policy master in perpetuity. According to the NY Times article:
Now, more than half of adults in the United States have been inoculated with at least one dose of a vaccine. But daily vaccination rates are slipping, and there is widespread consensus among scientists and public health experts that the herd immunity threshold is not attainable — at least not in the foreseeable future, and perhaps not ever.
Instead, they are coming to the conclusion that rather than making a long-promised exit, the virus will most likely become a manageable threat that will continue to circulate in the United States for years to come, still causing hospitalizations and deaths but in much smaller numbers.
How much smaller is uncertain and depends in part on how much of the nation, and the world, becomes vaccinated and how the coronavirus evolves. It is already clear, however, that the virus is changing too quickly, new variants are spreading too easily and vaccination is proceeding too slowly for herd immunity to be within reach anytime soon.
Continued immunizations, especially for people at highest risk because of age, exposure or health status, will be crucial to limiting the severity of outbreaks, if not their frequency, experts believe.
“The virus is unlikely to go away,” said Rustom Antia, an evolutionary biologist at Emory University in Atlanta. “But we want to do all we can to check that it’s likely to become a mild infection.”
The shift in outlook presents a new challenge for public health authorities. The drive for herd immunity — by the summer, some experts once thought possible — captured the imagination of large segments of the public. To say the goal will not be attained adds another “why bother” to the list of reasons that vaccine skeptics use to avoid being inoculated.
Yet vaccinations remain the key to transforming the virus into a controllable threat, experts said.
Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the Biden administration’s top adviser on Covid-19, acknowledged the shift in experts’ thinking.
“People were getting confused and thinking you’re never going to get the infections down until you reach this mystical level of herd immunity, whatever that number is,” he said.
“That’s why we stopped using herd immunity in the classic sense,” he added. “I’m saying: Forget that for a second. You vaccinate enough people, the infections are going to go down.”
Did you hear (read) what Fauci said? He referred to stopping using the term herd immunity in the “classic sense.” What he’s really saying is that the concept of herd immunity is for us to forget ever getting there. Why? Because we’re much closer to getting there than Fauci or the Covid tyrants want us to realize.
There are many common misconceptions about herd immunity, so let’s debunk a few. For herd immunity to be achieved, that does not mean everyone or even nearly everyone needs to be immune. We achieved herd immunity for past diseases when around 40% were immune. That number makes it too challenging for a disease to properly flourish, allowing it to die off naturally. With a disease as contagious as Covid-19, the number may approach 50%. But it’s not 65%, 80%, or even 100% as I’ve heard from some so-called experts.
Way back when before pretty much everyone in mainstream media was conscripted into the Covid tyrants’ army, there was even a report on Newsweek through MSN that said Covid herd immunity could be achieved at 47% infection rate. Where are we now? Some say we’re as high as 40%, but the consensus (a real one this time) is that around 1/3rd of the population has been infected at one point or another over the last year.
As mentioned before, it’s not ALL about us hillbillies keeping the nation down with our embrace of freedom and skepticism of vaccine pseudo-science. The disease has to take some of the blame because states like Florida and Texas are doing better without lockdowns than states like California, New York, or Michigan where lockdowns are the new permanent normal. They needed a scapegoat and the disease allegedly provided it by creating new strains every couple of days, or so it seems. The NY Times article made sure to create the strains boogeyman to drive the fear of the Covid gods into the hearts of mortal men:
Early on, the target herd immunity threshold was estimated to be about 60 to 70 percent of the population. Most experts, including Dr. Fauci, expected that the United States would be able to reach it once vaccines were available.
But as vaccines were developed and distribution ramped up through the winter and into the spring, estimates of the threshold began to rise. That is because the initial calculations were based on the contagiousness of the original version of the virus. The predominant variant now circulating in the United States, called B.1.1.7 and first identified in Britain, is about 60 percent more transmissible.
As a result, experts now calculate the herd immunity threshold to be at least 80 percent. If even more contagious variants develop, or if scientists find that immunized people can still transmit the virus, the calculation will have to be revised upward again.
Polls show that about 30 percent of the U.S. population is still reluctant to be vaccinated. That number is expected to improve but probably not enough. “It is theoretically possible that we could get to about 90 percent vaccination coverage, but not super likely, I would say,” said Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Though resistance to the vaccines is a main reason the United States is unlikely to reach herd immunity, it is not the only one.
The narrative the Covid tyrants have created is a two-edged sword. Either we allegedly reach “herd immunity” by vaccinating everyone, in which case they win, or we never reach herd immunity, in which case they win. Either way, it’s the people who lose.
YouTube, Spotify, and other Big Tech platforms are taking Freedom First Network down
It’s no secret we speak our minds and bring on guests who do the same. That’s one of the biggest reasons we put together the Freedom First Network in the first place. There are far too many news outlets, including so-called “conservative” media companies, who are so beholden to Big Tech that they temper their perspectives at best and outright coverup the truth at worst. Many, as you all know, will blatantly lie in order to maintain the narrative that supports the radical agenda taking over much of the United States.
We have had our YouTube channel taken down. Many of our shows have been suppressed or removed by Facebook and Twitter. Spotify banned one of our shows completely from their platform. Google hates us. We’ve even been censored by some of the smaller players like Medium, Transistor, and Captivate. But we stand behind our reporting and perspectives and we refuse to bow down to Big Tech tyranny for the sake of pageviews or video plays.
This isn’t the easiest road to travel, especially for a media company that is so new. We launched Freedom First Network in 2020 to fight against the very censorship that we’re seeing so widespread today. We have found great homes for our content on freer speech platforms like Rumble and we’re putting our best efforts forward into building our presence on Locals. Nevertheless, we cannot do it alone. We need help.
One of the things cofounders Jeff Dornik and JD Rucker agreed to from the start was to never be the pawns of companies that do not embrace our worldview. Finding advertisers and affiliates is easy; we receive requests by companies wanting to be pushed on our shows every day. But it’s important to us that we’re promoting companies, services, and products that are beneficial to maintaining a Freedom First stance in America. As a result, we do not take on sponsors easily. We would rather rely on our own products like Freedom First Coffee and the support of our wonderful viewers, listeners, and readers.
Those who want to support us and help keep the fight for America’s future moving forward can do so by donating through our Locals page. There, you can donate monthly or one-time. Some have told us to use Patreon or GoFundMe, but both of those platforms have demonstrated a hatred for free speech. Locals does not. They embrace it. We encourage everyone to join us on Locals, but donations are greatly appreciated as well. We do not have day jobs. Our fight for freedom is a full-time gig.
Please feel free to reach out to us through our contact form. It goes directly to our founders, so if you’re interested in getting involved, investing, sponsoring, or even bringing a show to our network, let us know. May God Bless the United States of America!