Pelosi Is Trying to Erase the Family
Nancy Pelosi and other democrats are attempting to erase the family from our society by rejecting terms such as father, mother, brother, sister, daughter, son, etc. in the US House. Not only is this ridiculous it is dangerous for our society as a strong family unit weakens the state and a weak family unit always strengthens the state to the point of tyranny. Here is what the NOQ Report has to say about it:
“Nancy Pelosi and her fellow gender-inclusive enthusiasts have taken a bold and much-disparaged move to erase language that expresses the reality of familial relationships. In the name of inclusivity, words like “father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law” have been targeted for erasure from House proceedings.”
“If pursued, this scrubbing of gendered words from public communications in concert with other trans-inclusive initiatives will prove seismic in its effect on society. Pelosi and her associates are echoing the socialist-feminist ideology articulated by Shulamith Firestone in the 1970s: “It has become necessary to free humanity from the tyranny of its biology” and “eliminate the sex distinction itself [so that] genital differences between human beings would no longer matter culturally.” At its core, this means that male and female manifestations of the human body should no longer be legally recognized or culturally valued. We have been marching down this road for decades and are now approaching the endgame: a genderless society. The vilification of gendered language in public settings is a significant leap toward “freeing humanity from the tyranny of its biology” and undoing the significance of biological sex.
Between blatant attacks like this one and the moral decay of our nation the family unit is in grave danger and our nation is along with it!
MSNBC is Against Unemployment for the Unvaccinated
In a strange turn of events we see one entity of the main stream media oppose the expansion of the Welfare state. This opposition of course comes from the view that the unvaccinated are nothing more than second class citizens. Here is the piece from MSNBC:
Republicans are constantly concerned about how unemployment insurance could lead to societal ruin; they strive to restrict it, arguing that making it too generous could make not having a job more appealing than having one, and derail the economy. Amid a global pandemic, congressional Republicans lobbied hard against a lifesaving and poverty-reducing federal boost to unemployment insurance based on the largely dubious claim that it was driving a labor shortage. But in several states they control, Republicans have now taken up the unusual cause of loosening eligibility for unemployment insurance and making it more accessible. And they’re doing it for a very particular set of people: anti-vaxxers. In general in the U.S., if employees voluntarily quit or are fired for cause, including violating company policy, they’re not eligible for unemployment benefits. But according to The Washington Post, the Republican-led states of Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas and Tennessee have “carved out exceptions for those who won’t submit to the multi-shot coronavirus vaccine regimens that many companies now require.” And Wyoming, Wisconsin and Missouri are considering similar exceptions.
“I am sort of charmed by the GOP’s newfound commitment to a more accessible welfare state. It’s a quiet admission that a robust safety net is a way to protect the people’s well-being from tyranny in the workplace. But nowhere in this mandate-hostile worldview is there a serious commitment to the freedom of the nearly three-quarters of adults in the U.S. who have gotten vaccinated not to be subjected to the increased risk of being around the imperiously unvaccinated. Many in the GOP have made it clear that they find the freedom to expose others to harm to be their greatest cause.